|
I am a great believer in the basics. Foundational rules of grammar and syntax are not, in my view, limits to our self-expression but rather the laboratory in which greater experiments in self-expression can be conducted. One doesn’t become a jazz master, brilliantly creating in the moment, by playing notes arbitrarily and at random. One becomes a master of the notes by endlessly practicing the scales, and in so doing seeing relations of notes to each other that no one had discovered before. So it is with writing. If you struggle to improvise, to innovate, to get a good flow flowing, it may be because you struggle with your sentences. Let’s start there: What is a sentence? At its most elemental, a sentence is simply a thing, doing or being something else. A sentence is, in other words, a noun and a verb: something doing or being. The man sits. The woman reads. Those are both perfectly acceptable sentences that would be at home in a book or a story. You can add information to a sentence to make it more interesting, as when The boy kicks the ball. In this case, the “ball” is a direct object, the thing being acted upon. But that is not important for us at the moment. For now, notice simply The boy kicks. That is the heart of your sentence.
The two essential parts of your sentence must be in numerical agreement, i.e., singular or plural. If “A man sits,” then “The men sit.” If “A woman reads,” then “The women read.” Your verb must be aligned (conjugated) to the number of subjects (nouns) doing the action. Nothing will throw your reader off the track faster than subjects and verbs that do not align. If this is a difficulty in your writing, it’s because you periodically lose track of who or what, exactly, the subject of your sentence is. It is not correct to say “The brigade stacked their arms,” even though we know in our mind that a brigade consists of many soldiers. A brigade is a singular unit. Therefore it is correct to observe that “The brigade stacked its arms.” If you want to say “When the brigade advanced, many of them started to fall,” this is also incorrect. However the fix is simple: “When the soldiers of the brigade advanced, many began to fall.” In this case I have simply, and subtly, shifted the subject from the singular “brigade” to the plural “soldiers.” Easy! Keep track of you’re the structure of your sentences. Too many subjects or too many verbs not properly compounded to each other will result in run-on sentences or sentence fragments, both of which are deadly flow killers. My favorite book on sentences is Stanley Fish, How to Write a Sentence. It’s a short, little book with a passion for creative, inventive sentences. Fish shows how to develop a sentence, adding tension and contrast to heighten readers’ interest. Note that even an elaborate, poetic, and lyrical sentence knows of what it consists: a noun and a verb. One of the most beautiful sentences in the English language, Fitzgerald’s conclusion to The Great Gatsby, offers this tragic reflection: “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.” It has metaphor, lyricism, contrast, and symbolism. Fish offers a wonderful reflection on why the sentence works so well. But notice at its heart, if you strip away the poetry and the metaphor (“boats”), it is a very simple noun and verb: “We beat on.” That doesn’t work alone, but it is the scaffolding on which the rest of the sentence is layered. Young writers often get lost or confused in their sentences because they lose track of who or what is the doer, and what, exactly, is being done. If you keep those two things in your mind as you work to fashion ever-more creative and innovative sentences, your work will always stay grounded and you’ll more readily achieve the flow you are after. There is much more to be said about how to craft an effective sentence, but for now: identify your subject and your verb and you’re well on your way. --David J. Snyder
4 Comments
LM
1/19/2026 03:03:50 pm
I wonder what you think of Dreyer's English (2019). When I was in grad school, my advisor told me to read Fowler's Modern English Usage. Ironically, the older versions seem more useful than the newer, though they're a bit "fussy" in their prescriptions. Another advisor told me to read Strunk & White, which I find even more "fussy" and rant-like than Fowler. Besides Fish's book, which I'll have to check out, do you have any other style manuals you'd recommend or find useful? Are there some iron rules of syntax or grammar that should not be violated, like splitting an infinitive?
Reply
David Snyder
1/19/2026 09:38:09 pm
None of my advisors ever suggested checking out a style guide, or even thinking much about writing and narrative. Anything I learned about writing I learned post-grad school, most likely teaching it. Shows the relative quality of our respective grad programs!
Reply
LM
1/20/2026 09:11:08 am
Yes, rigidly following a style manual is well...rigid, but as you say, knowing the "rules" is good, and allows one to make intelligent decisions about their prose. So looking at Strunk & White or Fish seem like good advice. To that end, I endeavor to boldly, confidently go forward no matter where I'm at.
David Snyder
1/20/2026 09:19:50 am
I am regularly, routinely, and persistently distressed by such posts . . .
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an editor and historian of US history, diplomacy, and international relations. Archives
February 2026
Categories
All
Why empire?This blog presents new scholarship on American empire, places the American experience in a broader and global imperial context, explores imperial habits throughout American society and culture, uncovers the imperial connections between the foreign and the domestic, and develops “empire” as a critical perspective.
At least two features in the American experience are clarified through the lens of American empire: First, we better understand persistent social inequities in a nation professing a fundamental commitment to equality. Second, even a cursory glance at American history makes plain the chronic violence at the center of US foreign policy, which frequently mounts or supports bloody military conflict abroad. Empire helps us recognize how and why the United States seems to be constantly at war--including often with itself--with all the foreign and domestic consequences thereof. |
RSS Feed